The Huffington Post
September 29, 2009"
U.S. first lady Michelle Obama is to kick off the 40th anniversary season of the children's TV show "
Sesame Street" with a segment encouraging kids to plant gardens and eat
healthy food.
Obama, who is planting a fruit and vegetable garden
on the grounds of the White House, will appear in the November10 season
debut of "Sesame Street" -- the educational show for kids that is
broadcast in more than 120 countries around the world.
Producers said on Tuesday that Obama will teach the furry "residents"
of Sesame Street about the benefits of growing a garden and healthy
living, and will show children how to plant tomato, cucumber and lettuce seeds."
10:38 AM,
September 30, 2009
The Wall Street Journal
August 4, 2009"Forget about the birthers, and the nutty claims that Barack Obama was not born in the United States.
More and more, we are hearing from people who might best be
described as anti-birthers. Their claims have nothing to do with long-
versus short-form Hawaiian birth certificates. Instead, they advance a
simple proposition: that the birth of each additional American child is
a kind of calamity for the environment.
The most recent example of anti-birth thinking comes from Paul
Murtaugh and Michael Schlax of Oregon State University. In a study
called "Reproduction and the carbon legacies of individuals," they
suggest that if you truly care about the environment, it's not enough
to trade your SUV for a Prius, use the right lightbulbs, or limit your
lawn to organic fertilizers. To the contrary, you need to start
thinking about something way more important: i.e., having one less
child.
The "basic premise," the study reports, is that "a person is responsible for emissions of his descendents.""
12:07 PM,
August 04, 2009
Christian Science Monitor
May 13, 2009
"Later today, the website Climate Culture
is releasing a list of the 2009 Top Green Myths, things that you do -
or don't do - because you've read or been told they're good or bad for
the environment - but which, surprisingly, may not be producing the
green results youre expecting.
Lots of these have been argued before - Is local food always
greener? Are paper bags better than plastic? - and there's not always
one "right" answer to them. But let's look at the list and then get
your opinion :
1. Green myth: Recycled paper is better for the environment than virgin paper. Fact:
Recycled paper can sometimes be more carbon intensive than virgin
paper. It depends on where you live. If your home is in the Pacific
Northwest or Maine, where much of the electricity comes from hydro
power, you may be better off with virgin paper since plants that
manufacture recycle paper are often near large metro areas where power
is from less efficient sources. The "difference in emissions from
electricity use in paper production can be larger than the emissions
associated with cutting down the tree to produce paper in the first
place," notes Zeke Hausfather, executive vice president of energy
science at Climate Culture."
10:46 AM,
May 13, 2009